Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Letter Writing Campaign or FIRE-BOMBS for DEA? WHY NOT BOTH?

DEA To Ban Synthetic Marijuana In 30 Days

By Steve Elliott ~alapoet~ in News, Products
Wednesday, Nov. 24 2010 @ 2:03PM
k2.jpeg
Photo: City Pages
The Drug Enforcement Administration on Wednesday said it will ban five chemicals used to produce so-called "synthetic marijuana," making the product illegal to sell or possess in the United States.

"The owners of the head shops and the convenience stores that sell these products have no less than 30 days to clear their shelves," said DEA special agent Terri K. Wyatt, reports Chance Welch of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

The "fake pot" products will be illegal in another month as the DEA is taking emergency action to ban the chemicals used to make them, report Pierre Thomas and Lisa Jones of ABC News.

"Over the past year, smokable herbal blends marketed as being 'legal' and providing a marijuana-like high, have become increasingly popular, particularly among teens and young adults," the DEA said in a Wednesday news release.

spice-stynthetic-marijuana-drug-1028-300x225.jpeg
Photo: RolledTooTight
​The five chemicals used to make fake pot weakly mimic THC, an active ingredient in marijuana, and are not approved for human consumption. They have been sold as "incense" to bypass rules surrounding products meant to be consumed.

While synthetic marijuana does produce a high, it is short-acting, typically around 30 minutes, and does not produce the munchies as does marijuana. It will also, unlike real pot, give you a splitting headache if you mix it with alcohol.

According to the DEA, products like Spice, K2, Blaze, and Red X Dawn are labeled as incense to mask their intended purpose.

The DEA-proposed ban will put the chemicals in Schedule I, the same category as heroin and marijuana, more restrictive than cocaine, which is Schedule II. It will take effect in 30 days and last at least a year, in all likelihood remaining permanent.

Schedule I drugs are federally defined as substances which have a high potential for addiction and no accepted medical uses.

The herbal "incense" blends are currently available in smoke shops, convenience stores and on the Internet.

"Makers of these harmful products mislead their customers into thinking that 'fake pot' is a harmless alternative to illegal drugs, but that is not the case," said Michele Leonhart, acting DEA administrator, reports Justin Blum at Bloomberg. "Today's action will call further attention to the risks of ingesting unknown compounds and will hopefully take away any incentive to try these products."

The DEA published a notice in today's Federal Register saying that it intends to ban the chemicals. After 30 days, the DEA plans to post a rule to "temporarily control" the chemicals for at least 12 months, according to the statement.

During that time, the Department of Health and Human Services said it "plans to study" whether the chemicals should be permanently banned. Don't hold your breath, because so far, they've never changed about banning a substance once it goes on the "bad list."

At least 15 states have acted to ban one or more of the five chemicals targeted by the DEA, which have names like JWH-018 (the most common) and JWH-200. The other targeted chemicals are JWH-073, CP-47,497 and cannabicyclohexanol, reports Keegan Hamilton at Riverfront Times.

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) this month sent a letter to Leonhart asking for synthetic marijuana to be banned, saying use of the substances was reaching "epidemic proportions" in his state.

The DEA claims that use of fake pot has prompted visits to emergency rooms and more than 1,500 calls to poison control centers.

By Wednesday afternoon, the DEA's notice had already attracted supporters and detractors, reports the Star-Telegram.

Opponents of the move include Grant Smith, federal policy coordinator of the Drug Policy Alliance. Smith said that instead of criminalizing the chemicals and products, the DPA favors studying the chemicals, banning their sale to minors and requiring proper product labeling.

"Criminalizing this outright will not only lead to more people being prosecuted and jailed for non-violent crimes but will also cede control of the market to criminals instead of regulating it for sale," Smith said.

Smith also said that government control of the chemicals will limit the amount of research that can be done.

"Because it's Schedule I, the government decides who researches it and for what reasons," Smith said.

"These products are a predictable outgrowth of criminal marijuana prohibition," said Paul Armentano with the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), reports Ryan Grim at Huffington Post.

"As prohibition is apt to do, it has driven the production of a commodity into the hands of unregulated, unknown dealers, driven up the potency of the commodity, and in doing so created a scenario where the consumer is faced with a potentially greater health risk than they would be had they simply had the legal choice to use the product they actually desired, in this case cannabis," Armentano said.

"Given that most manufacturers of these products are overseas and not subject to U.S. laws and regulations, it is unlikely that the DEA's action will in any way halt the dissemination, use or misuse of these products among the public," Armentano said.

Those who supported the measure included Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), who spoke in favor of the move on Wednesday.

"I commend the DEA for using their emergency scheduling authority to protect public health by keeping these substances away from young people," Kerlikowske said. "Until the risks associated with ingesting these products and chemicals can be studied and understood, there is no place for them on the shelves of any legitimate business."

The new publicity will likely only stoke demand and increase interest in the fake pot, reports the Huffington Post. K2incense.org already boasts that was "featured on Fox News."

Monday, November 15, 2010

And The Beat(ing) Goes On......





Well comrades, the forces of EVIL have conspired again (they are really big on conspiring---it's their main way of getting things done); we have been told that California voters rejected the Proposition that would have INCREASED their liberties and freedoms!

What do I mean? We are told by "the media" (you know how trustworthy THEY are........recall how they sucked up to the criminals Bush, Rice and Cheney...) that Proposition 19, the Tax and Regulate Marijuana Act "failed to pass" by a 7.6% margin.

To these numbers---- "official results" of what is laughingly called "the most progressive state in the USA," I say flatly and boldly:
BULLSHIT!

First of all, the results go against all logic! It is logical to desire to be as free as one can, as an individual and as a people.
So, we are expected to believe, with no serious inquiry or investigation WHATSOEVER (So far!) these results that make no sense whatsoever? !Al diablo con los fachas! (To Hell With These Fascists!).

Second, who does not want to be freer? Some poor suckers in the "fly-over states" might desire to be less and less free, and truly they deserve what they vote for! But CALIFORNIA?!?!?!?! COME ON......IT'S JUST TOO MUCH HORSESHIT TO SWALLOW! Californians are not THAT STUPID!

We have lead the way in Free Speech (Free Speech Movement started at UC Berkeley), we spearheaded the protests that ENDED the Viet Nam war, we made San Francisco a mecca for gay/lesbian/bisexual/transsexual rights.....you get the picture, yes? And generally, the rest of the country, within 6 to 10 years, after much teeth-gnashing, drama and hand-wringing, adopts the change we initiated. Look back at history for a minute, and see if that is not true.

Yes. It is. So, after intellectuals in other countries demanded legalization as early as 1967 (witness the SOMA petition, published in the U.K. newspapers in that year, signed by the Beatles, clergymen and many leading scientists, demanding that this harmless and beneficial plant be legalized) here we are in 2010, in the great USA with our thumb up our asses--letting the screwheads imprison and torture our brothers and sisters.

So here, forty-three (that's FORTY-THREE GODDAMN YEARS!) later, we get the chance to right this enormous wrong, to SMASH TO BITS the VERY CORNERSTONE of the edifice of the Drug War itself. It only took 43 years of persecution, making criminals out of people who did nothing wrong, creating a second-class citizenry, ruining hundreds of thousands of lives so that finally, enough of us were RIGHTEOUSLY PISSED-OFF ENOUGH that we pounded the pavement and got the plethora of signatures required to get this momentous choice on the ballot in California.

Here please see the State of California's official vote count (although the website still says "unofficial results" two weeks AFTER the election). http://vote.sos.ca.gov/maps/ballot-measures/19/

It gives a county-by-county breakdown of which counties voted for Legalization of nature, and which dillf*cks still arrogantly believe they know better than God and modern science. It is not surprising at all that the "Emerald Triangle" counties that produce so much pot at so much obscene profit (thanks so much, my hippie "brothers and sisters!" Cop-outs! Quislings!)
voted against legalization (would've brought down their profit margin and make 'em pay TAXES---Oh my Lord! It is the fucking least the bastards could do.)

And of course the major concentrations of fascists (Orange and Sacramento counties) naturally voted against increased freedom and access to their birthright.

Would my dear readers (all six of you!) like to know my theories about the Proposition 19 "results?" I take that as a yes.
I am nearly certain that votes were openly bought in many counties--especially the "Emerald Triangle" and the more rural parts of the state.

I am certain that industries with vested interests against "competition," like the alcoholic beverage industries and Big Pharma paid for votes too. This may not have been the only mechanism of fakery in this vote count. While I am no big fan of our new Attorney General Kamala Harris, I insist that one of her first duties in office must be to launch an official hard-core investigation of improprieties regarding Prop 19. I urge all like-minded, free-thinking and freedom-loving readers to write with me to Governor Brown (who has extensive experience as former AG) and Kamala Harris as well, and demand an exhaustive investigation of these alleged serious crimes.

Recall, you Democrats we just elected, vote-tampering/fraud is a FELONY!
BEGIN THE INVESTIGATION ALREADY!
IT IS YOUR JOB NOW.
GET ON IT, MAKE IT SO!

By the way,
I AM MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!

ANDRE S. LANGE, M.D. (UNIV OF LOUISVILLE 1990)


Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Proposition 19 reportedly fails to pass!

This is my exchange between Richard Lee and myself from today's email. Andre S. Lange, M.D.



Attn: Richard Lee,
Yes On 19/Oaksterdam University

It is extremely hard to believe/accept these election results!

First I speak of the Prop 19 Initiative----the entrenched establishment that "had stakes" in keeping pot illegal: the liquor and tobacco industries; Big Pharma; many of the cops (not all!); many of the judges and D.A.'s (NOT ALL THANK GOD!); but, the bigger fish--those who control vast fields of illegal (super-expensive) pot and the criminal cartels who want to keep their tax-free big incomes flowing in; lastly, sadly and pitifully--many in the medical marijuana movement--especially the owners/staffs of cannabis "cooperatives!"

Frankly, given all the support I witnessed and helped foment before the election, the results smell of corruption. I doubt it was direct ballot tampering or electronic voting machine manipulation, a la Bush, though that needs to be ruled out. No, I think it needs to be investigated if many votes were LITERALLY BOUGHT--people being paid to vote against it (Prop 19.)

By whom(?), the question begs itself---We must first investigate the bigwigs in the alcohol and tobacco industries and those, known by some in the movement, as large illegal growers. Just a thought for our new "oakland" governor, Jerry B, who used to be Attorney General of California--
I urge many to wrote to him/call with:

"Jerry, there are reports of improprieties in the election regarding votes being bought/sold in counties that voted heavily AGAINST PROP 19, please see that the new AG starts a vigorous investigation!" Really!

Searching For Truth And Justice,

Andre S. Lange, MD
Medical Marijuana Advocate Group
cannabisrxnow.org

Your thoughts are what frighten you. Choose to change them, and the fear is gone.


From: Richard Lee
To: Andre Lange
Sent: Wed, November 3, 2010 4:45:12 PM
Subject: The fight continues


Andre,

While we didn't bring in enough votes last night to pass Prop 19, we are proud of the tremendous wave of support we received. There are millions of people in California and across the country who are prepared to help finish the job they started here last night when we come back to the polls stronger than ever in 2012.

The fact that 3,412,387 Californians voted to legalize marijuana is a tremendous victory. We have broken the glass ceiling. Prop 19 has changed the terms of the debate.

The fight continues. In the coming months, we'll email you periodic updates on marijuana policy, introduce some of our most vital partner organizations, and provide opportunities for online and offline advocacy so you can stay active and engaged in this movement. So please stay tuned.

Thank you so much for being part of something so special. We didn't get the result we wanted last night, but it's clearer than ever to me that it's no longer a matter of if we'll end cannabis prohibition -- it's simply a matter of when.

Sincerely,

Richard Lee
Proponent, Yes on 19

Yes on 19. Tax Cannabis 2010. Sponsored by S.K. Seymour LLC, a Medical Cannabis Provider, dba Oaksterdam University, a Cannabis Educator. FPPC 1318272